Author: Matt Ridley
Genre: non fiction, evolution, psychology
Genre: non fiction, evolution, psychology
After being enthralled by ‘Genome’
written by the same author, I eagerly picked up this book, whose description
seemed equally promising. Written on a completely different subject, this books
is about human nature; in particular, the social side of it.
The book however starts with the
gene- or to be precise, the selfish gene concept. Many animals do live in large groups, showing
division of labour and hierarchy comparable to human societies. However, their
cooperation may be driven by the selfishness of individuals to preserve and
promote their own genes. But then are human societies any different? May be and
may be not. In his charming and witty style of writing, Ridley manages to
encompass evidence from divverse fields like economics, philosophy, anthropology
and evolutionary biology to argue that contrary to popular belief, humans are
still driven by instinct to a large extent. These instincts drive us to
cooperate, drive morality, form societies and make us be nice to each other in
general. But these instincts also have a darker side. They lead to groupishness,
which manifests itself in the form of racism and eugenics. A recurring theme in
the book is that we perform a lot of seemingly altruistic acts with the
expectation of a similar favour in return. In many cases the returning favour may
not be the immediate or of similar nature, but the hope is there nevertheless.
The book is full of interesting
insights which are explained and justified using ample of examples from animal
world and human societies. There are some that I found particularly illuminating.
For example, in one of the early chapters, Ridley discusses why we require
emotions and moral sentiments. It seems that they do help in decisions making
and that without them we would end up being rational fools, incapable of making
any choice. In the case of sharing, he mentions that gift giving can actually
be a form of competition by showing examples of certain North American Indian
tribes. Another curious point put forward is that we are not conservationists
by nature. The rosy picture of tribal groups being one with nature and
respecting it is largely an illusion. Interestingly, conservation is most effective
in privately owned areas rather than government owned areas.
In all, I found the book to be
both entertaining and enlightening. Both the style of writing and the contents
are equally fascinating. Although, I do not agree to all that the writer
concludes, there still many remarkable revelations that do make the book worth reading.
I would highly recommend anyone wanting to have a deeper understanding of human
social structure.
Comments
Post a Comment